Template talk:Heroability

I love this template, but two issues to note that can be seen from the Man-at-Arms page right now. Both are minor problems of course, otherwise this template is quite spectacular. 1. For buffs only, the text is not center aligned for the 'Target' field 2. For all abilities when targeting the whole party (enemy or own), the ability links still have the small line for the chain end (Bellow target for example) --Lovethismod 18:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. We're currently trying to fix issue n°1, unfortunately the code has got quite complex and I have yet to figure out why it's not working as intended. I'll try to fix issue n*2 right away. --itaShadd (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * There, issue n°2 should be fixed; it might not show up for a bit because of the browser's cache, but users that haven't visited the page since the last edit should see it fine right away. --itaShadd (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your time on making and fixing this. Saw what you did for the pip fix, and put a change in to correct it for buffs as well. Great job on the template again by the way, I find it fantastic in comparison to the previous one. --Lovethismod 21:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I've evidently not wasted my evening yesterday. :D It's a shame I haven't been able to make it fully work as intended yet. --itaShadd (talk) 21:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Slight issue for abilities that have heal/buff parameter
While editing the template, I noticed that abilities that have the heal or buff parameter will have their effect description moved to the next column over. On the Crusader page for example, his ability Inspiring Cry has the heal parameter set to yes. The effect description is in the Self column despite the syntax in the table setting |effect=Stress Heal +6, Torch +5 TheDongster (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Since the introduction of the "buff" option there are a lot of unexpected behaviours happening. I'll try to fix those. --itaShadd (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * All problems should now be fixed. --itaShadd (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks fantastic, great job! --Lovethismod 19:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks ItaShadd, this template helps out a lot. TheDongster (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)